danuv: (Default)
[personal profile] danuv
Yesterday I began reading one of my feminist art history books. It isn't a large book but it is written in Scholarese. Every sentence is taking me eons to pick apart and understand, when I can. It isn't that the concepts themselves are so difficult, it's that the way she choses to phrase them seems intended to obfuscate their meaning. Personally I think this is a weapon that the ultra-educated use to weed out those of us who lack what they consider to be the proper level of indoctrination. Oh well, I want to learn what they have to teach and so I guess I will have to play their game.

Date: 2006-04-19 01:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/idlewild_/
It's frustrating though. I tried to read that awesome book on English Rhetoric in India but it was so full of Academic BullShit that it wasn't even a matter of not being able to untangle sentences - even when I untangled them I was left going "Huh? Oh no you didn't!"

Date: 2006-04-19 06:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danuv.livejournal.com
Which is surprising in a book about rhetoric? :P

Date: 2006-04-19 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/idlewild_/
Not really, and even less surprising in a book full of joyous postcolonial jargon :P I'm glad at least once you get yours untangled it's not crazy concepts too. I think reading academic writing is like riding a bike -annoying and requires a helmet and kneepads. Or - once you get the hang of it you can always somehow pick it up again. But it's a definite skill.

Profile

danuv: (Default)
danuv

January 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24 252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 7th, 2026 05:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios